All tracks
Knowledge

Institutional Memory & AI Tools

Documenting decisions and lessons, and using AI tools responsibly for research, documentation and productivity.

2 lessons · 75 min

Sign in Enroll

  1. 01

    What to document, and when

    25 min

    What you will be able to do

    • Identify the four essential types of operational records needed for response room continuity.
    • Apply data minimization standards to sanitize incident logs under conflict conditions.
    • Draft clear, actionable handover notes for key response room volunteer roles.
    • Establish low-tech daily record-keeping routines that function during prolonged power blackouts.
    • Distinguish strictly between neutral operational facts and sensitive or non-essential personal information.

    Why Institutional Memory Matters in Active War

    In a neighbourhood Emergency Response Room (ERR), operational conditions shift rapidly. An artillery strike closes a primary supply route, an internet blackout cuts communications for weeks, or a volunteer responsible for kitchen purchasing is forced to relocate overnight. When operational knowledge exists only in the minds of individual volunteers, the loss of one person can freeze community kitchens, disrupt water distribution points, or misplace scarce funds.

    Institutional memory is not bureaucratic paperwork or administrative overhead. It is the practical, shared habit of recording essential information so that the response room continues serving the community regardless of who rotates out or how long communications remain down. In active conflict zones across Sudan, clear documentation is an essential tool for community resilience, resource protection, and volunteer safety.

    The Four Essential Records

    To keep a response room operating reliably without overburdening exhausted volunteers, your team only needs to maintain four core records. Each record addresses a specific operational need.

    1. Decision Logs

    A decision log is a brief, dated record explaining why specific choices were made. When resources are tight, volunteers frequently face tough choices: reducing meal portion sizes, shifting a water delivery point to a safer street, or switching fuel vendors. Recording the rationale behind these decisions prevents repetitive debates and maintains transparency among team members.

    Rules for decision logging:

    • Record the decision within 12 hours of making it.
    • Keep the record strictly operational.
    • Focus on four elements: Date/Time, Operational Problem, Action Chosen, and Rationale.

    Field example: "14 May, 09:00 - Main flour route from Central Market blocked. Action: Approved buying sorghum from Neighbourhood Market B at a 10% higher price. Rationale: Avoids active transit risks while securing three days of food for the communal kitchen."

    2. Operational Lessons Learned

    Every day at a community kitchen, health point, or emergency shelter, volunteers discover what succeeds and what fails under field conditions. Operational lessons capture practical insights so that future shifts or neighbouring response rooms do not repeat preventable mistakes.

    Lessons must focus on processes, storage conditions, and logistics—never on assigning personal blame to individual volunteers.

    Field scenario at 6:00 AM:
    A shift leader notices that two sacks of lentils spoiled because they absorbed moisture from a damp floor.
    Wrong response: Blaming the volunteer who unloaded the truck.
    Correct response (Lesson Logged): "Lesson: Store all dry legumes on wooden pallets elevated at least 15 cm off clay floors to prevent moisture damage during humid periods."

    3. Safety and Incident Logs

    Incident logs record security events, road closures, market disruptions, or access delays affecting your room's work. These records allow team coordinators to identify dangerous trends—such as recurring checkpoint delays on specific days—and modify delivery schedules or routes accordingly.

    The Principle of Data Minimization: In conflict environments, physical or digital documentation can become a major safety risk if searched at a checkpoint or accessed by unauthorized actors. You must strip all sensitive data from incident records:

    • NEVER record names of military units, armed groups, or political factions.
    • NEVER record full names, phone numbers, or addresses of individual volunteers or local residents.
    • Use functional, generic descriptions: "unidentified armed individuals", "commercial road inspection", "district border crossing".

    | What to Record | What NOT to Record | | :--- | :--- | | "12 June, 08:30: Water tanker delayed 3 hours at eastern crossing due to vehicle inspection." | "12 June: Armed group [Name] commanded by [Name] detained driver [Name] at the bridge." | | "15 June: Cooking oil price rose 30% across local markets following fuel supply disruption." | "15 June: Merchants linked to [Faction] are manipulating market prices." |

    4. Handover Notes

    A handover note is a concise, one-page summary written when a volunteer holding an operational role (such as a kitchen manager, medical coordinator, or logistics lead) must rotate out or leave the area. A sudden handover without written notes often leads to lost vendor deposits, duplicated purchases, or broken community agreements.

    A complete handover note contains five elements:

    1. Operational Contacts: Verified local vendors, water truckers, and neighborhood elders (listed by first name or code and functional role).
    2. Inventory Status: Physical count of food, fuel, or medical stock currently present at the site.
    3. Pending Commitments: Unpaid vendor bills, planned inventory arrivals, or promised community distributions.
    4. Routine Operational Schedule: Key operating hours, generator run-times, or distribution procedures.
    5. Emergency Information: Location of backup paper logs and physical safe keys.

    Formats: Paper versus Digital in Network Blackouts

    When electrical grids fail and mobile networks are unavailable for extended periods, response rooms must use simple, reliable documentation methods:

    1. Physical Logbooks: Use hard-cover bound notebooks kept in a secure, dry box. Write with waterproof ballpoint pens. Physical notebooks remain fully functional during total power blackouts.
    2. Offline Digital Notes: If using mobile devices, write simple plain-text (.txt or markdown) files or basic offline spreadsheets saved directly to local storage. Keep devices password-protected.
    3. Daily 5-Minute Closing Routine: At shift change or facility closing, take five minutes with the team to record daily totals, decisions made, and any incidents before leaving.

    Standard Principles for Record-Keeping

    • Promptness: Record events on the day they occur while details are clear.
    • Neutrality: Stick strictly to observable facts (quantities, times, physical locations, operational actions). Avoid political commentary or speculation.
    • Physical Protection: Store paper logs out of public view. Establish a clear rule for which volunteer is responsible for securing or destroying sensitive records if safety is threatened.

    Key terms

    Institutional Memoryالذاكرة المؤسسية
    The collective body of operational knowledge, decisions, and procedures stored by an organization across volunteer turnover.
    Decision Logسجل القرارات
    A chronological record detailing operational problems, choices made, and the specific reasons behind those choices.
    Data Minimizationتقليل البيانات
    The practice of recording only the minimum necessary information and stripping sensitive details to protect individuals.
    Handover Noteمذكرة التسليم والتسلم
    A concise document written by an outgoing volunteer summarizing ongoing work, inventory, vendor contacts, and key risks.
    Operational Lessonالدرس التشغيلي
    A documented insight explaining how a specific work process succeeded or failed, used to improve future performance.

    Field case study

    Disruption at the Neighbourhood Kitchen

    In a densely populated district under active siege, a local Response Room operated a communal kitchen supplying 400 meals daily. The kitchen manager held all operational details in his personal phone and head—including arrangements with the local flour merchant, payment terms for firewood, and the location of spare water valve keys.

    When heavy fighting broke out near his residence, the kitchen manager had to flee to another province overnight without warning. The remaining volunteers arrived at 6:00 AM to prepare breakfast. They found themselves completely blocked: they did not know which flour vendor had received an advance cash deposit of 150,000 SDG, nor where the firewood delivery was scheduled to come from.

    To keep the kitchen open, the team spent emergency cash to buy grain from a second merchant at double the market price. Two days later, the original merchant arrived demanding pickup of the already-paid flour, revealing that the response room had duplicated its expenditure and exhausted its emergency reserve. Furthermore, the incident log contained sensitive notes about military movements near the market, causing severe anxiety when volunteers passed local checkpoints.

    Operational Changes Made

    Following this crisis, the response room instituted three basic practices:

    1. The Physical Logbook: Placed a waterproof hardcover notebook inside a locked cabinet at the kitchen site.
    2. Sanitization Protocol: Stripped all political and security commentary from notes, recording only operational delays and prices.
    3. Daily Closing Checklist: Required the shift lead to spend 5 minutes every evening recording daily meal counts, current inventory balance, and active vendor deposits.

    Discussion Questions

    1. How would a 1-page handover note have protected the response room's cash reserves in this situation?
    2. What specific details in the original kitchen manager's records posed a safety risk, and how should they be sanitized?
    3. How can your response room make daily record-keeping a quick 5-minute habit rather than a heavy burden for tired volunteers?

    Composite case, built from documented practice. Names and locations are illustrative.

    Practice drill

    Practical Drill: The 10-Minute Handover and Sanitization Exercise

    Time required: 30 minutes
    Format: Pairs of volunteers
    Materials needed: Paper, pens, and the scenario sheet below.

    Drill Context

    You are the logistics coordinator for a local communal water point. It is 5:30 PM. Due to sudden safety developments in the neighbouring street, you must relocate to a safer district in 10 minutes. You need to leave a clear handover note for the incoming volunteer while ensuring the note contains no sensitive security data.

    Step 1: Review Raw Notes (5 Minutes)

    Review this raw draft note written during a chaotic shift:

    "18 August: Water driver Hassan arrived late at 14:00 because military group [Name] stopped him at the checkpoint near the high school. He had to pay 5,000 SDG to cross. We still owe merchant Omer 40,000 SDG for fuel. The backup pump key is hidden under the blue plastic drum in the storage room. Volunteer Fatima has the safe key. Don't buy fuel from the eastern market because armed group [Name] is seizing vehicles there."

    Step 2: Draft the Sanitized Handover Note (10 Minutes)

    Working in pairs, rewrite this note into a clean, professional, standardized handover sheet on a fresh piece of paper. Apply data minimization rules:

    • Remove all armed group or faction names.
    • Remove unnecessary personal full names or dangerous security accusations.
    • Categorize the information clearly under: (1) Active Assets & Access Keys, (2) Pending Debts & Vendors, (3) Operational Warnings.

    Step 3: Peer Verification (10 Minutes)

    Swap notes with another pair. Read their handover note as if you are the new volunteer arriving at 6:00 AM tomorrow. Test the document against these three questions:

    1. Can I locate the backup pump key and manage fuel debt without making extra phone calls?
    2. Does this note contain any names or phrases that would endanger me if searched at a checkpoint?
    3. Is the document concise enough to read in under 2 minutes?

    Success Criteria

    • Zero faction or group names present in the sanitized note.
    • Clear listing of the 40,000 SDG fuel debt and functional location of equipment.
    • Document organized under standard headings and readable without internet or external explanation.

    References & further reading

    1. Sphere Handbook: Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Humanitarian ResponseSphere Association, 2018

      Consult the foundational management and documentation standards to maintain operational continuity when key volunteers are displaced.

    2. Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and AccountabilityCHS Alliance, 2024

      Review Commitment 7 on continuous learning and documentation to structure your response room's operational record-keeping.

    3. Do No Harm: A Framework for Analyzing the Impact of Assistance on ConflictCDA Collaborative Learning

      Examine guidance on sensitive data transfer to ensure logbooks do not create security risks for volunteers or residents.

    4. ALNAP: Evaluation of Humanitarian Action GuideALNAP

      Read the practical protocols on capturing operational learning during active crisis response to design simple decision logs.

    5. Open Knowledge / DataKind guidance on responsible data in humanitarian work; OCHA Centre for Humanitarian DataOCHA Centre for Humanitarian Data

      Refer to data minimization and anonymization principles before establishing incident and handover notes.

  2. 02

    Using AI tools responsibly

    25 min

    What you will be able to do

    • Identify safe and constructive operational uses for AI tools in response room administration.
    • Apply the Zero-Leak protocol to sanitize sensitive field data prior to using any cloud tool.
    • Detect AI hallucinations, translation errors, and potential neutrality violations in generated text.
    • Execute a 4-step workflow for sanitizing, prompting, verifying, and localizing AI output.

    Introduction: AI Tools in the Midst of Crisis

    As a volunteer in an Emergency Response Room (ERR), your daily workload is immense. Between managing community kitchens, coordinating emergency medical points, and securing clean water, you are often asked to write activity reports, draft grant proposals, translate updates for international partners, or digest long technical manuals. When internet connectivity becomes briefly available via satellite connections or local networks, AI text models can serve as powerful tools to reduce administrative friction and save hours of work.

    However, using AI in a active conflict environment carries extreme risks. AI platforms run on external, cloud-based servers. Every piece of text you paste into a prompt can be stored, analyzed, or exposed through data breaches. In an environment where armed actors scrutinize phone data and community members face severe protection risks, a single mistake—such as pasting a volunteer's name or a kitchen's location into an online AI tool—can lead to harassment, arrest, or targeted attacks. This lesson provides clear, practical guidelines on how to leverage AI tools productively while enforcing ironclad security standards.

    Core Capabilities: What AI Can Help You Do Responsibly

    When used correctly, AI models act as rapid administrative assistants. They excel at processing structure, grammar, and generic information. You can responsibly use AI for four primary tasks:

    1. Drafting and Formatting Reports

    AI tools can transform bullet points into well-structured paragraphs. If you log daily kitchen outputs (e.g., number of meals cooked, firewood consumed, hours operated), you can paste anonymous, sanitized notes into an AI tool and ask it to format them into a standard narrative report.

    2. Translation and Language Bridging

    Many funding opportunities and international reports require written English, while local operational logs are kept in Arabic. AI models can quickly convert draft text between Arabic and English. However, translated text must always be reviewed by a human to ensure context, tone, and technical terms are accurate.

    3. Summarising Heavy Manuals and Technical Guides

    When guidelines on water chlorination, disease outbreak response, or protection standards are distributed as long PDF documents, you can copy sections into an AI model and ask for a 5-bullet summary focused on immediate practical actions.

    4. Structuring Meeting Agendas and Planning

    AI can help build operational templates, risk assessment frameworks, or meeting agendas. For example, you can prompt the tool: "Provide a structured 30-minute agenda template for a community volunteer debriefing on water distribution challenges."

    The Absolute Red Lines: What Must NEVER Be Input Into an AI Model

    To safeguard your team and your community, you must adhere to the Zero-Leak Rule. Assume that any information entered into a cloud-based AI model becomes public domain immediately.

    | Restricted Data Category | Examples of Dangerous Inputs | Safe Alternative / Substitution | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Personal Identities | Names of volunteers, drivers, cooks, doctors, local council members, or displaced persons. | Use generic roles: "Volunteer A", "Kitchen Manager", "Resident". | | Specific Locations | Neighborhood street names, exact GPS coordinates, building landmarks, safe houses, or delivery routes. | Use high-level zones: "Zone 2", "District B", "Sector North". | | Financial Details | Bank account numbers, e-wallet account details, exact cash transfer amounts, or trader names. | Use generic labels: "Local Vendor X", "Transfer Channel 1", "Budget Item A". | | Protection & Incidents | Details of armed incursions, military movements, shelling incidents, or sensitive protection cases. | Do not input sensitive security incidents into AI under any circumstances. |

    The Verification Rule: Never Trust AI Outputs Unchecked

    AI models do not understand real-world facts; they generate text based on statistical patterns. They frequently create "hallucinations"—plausible-sounding statements that are entirely false. An AI model might invent non-existent health protocols, miscalculate budget totals, or mistranslate sensitive political terms in ways that violate humanitarian neutrality.

    Follow these three verification principles before sharing or using any AI-generated text:

    1. Verify All Numbers and Math: Never rely on AI to calculate total expenditure or food ration totals. Re-check every calculation manually.
    2. Check Neutrality and Nuance: In conflict zones, specific words carry heavy political weight. Ensure translations do not adopt partisan language, military terminology, or biased phrasing.
    3. Confirm Operational Accuracy: Ensure any recommended action fits local reality. An AI model does not know if a specific road is blocked or if electricity is down in your district.
    +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
    |                      THE 4-STEP SAFE AI WORKFLOW                      |
    +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
    |  1. SANITIZE  --> Remove names, exact locations, dates, and finances. |
    |  2. PROMPT    --> Input only anonymized structure and generic text.   |
    |  3. VERIFY    --> Check output manually for errors and political bias.|
    |  4. LOCALIZE  --> Adjust language to fit local field realities.      |
    +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
    

    Managing AI Constraints in Low-Bandwidth Environments

    Internet access in Sudan is frequently cut or limited to brief windows near satellite points. To use AI effectively under these constraints:

    • Prepare Prompts Offline: Write and sanitize your prompt in a local text editor on your phone or laptop before connecting to the internet.
    • Copy, Don't Browse: Connect to the network, paste your prepared prompt into the AI tool, copy the output immediately into a local document, and disconnect to save data and battery.
    • Use Offline Templates: Keep pre-approved narrative templates on encrypted USB drives so you do not rely on AI tools for routine, daily reporting.

    Key terms

    Data Sanitizationتنقية البيانات / التعمية
    The process of removing all personal identifiers, specific coordinates, financial figures, and operational security details from text before sharing or processing it.
    AI Hallucinationهلوسة الذكاء الاصطناعي
    A phenomenon where an AI model generates incorrect, fabricated, or illogical information while presenting it as factual.
    Zero-Leak Protocolبروتوكول التسريب الصفري
    A strict operational rule prohibiting the input of any sensitive individual, location, or financial data into online or third-party cloud tools.
    Prompt Sanitizationتنقية أجهزة الأوامر
    Drafting and checking a prompt offline to ensure no sensitive field information is included before submitting it to an online model.
    Context Verificationالتحقق السياقي
    The mandatory review of AI outputs by human volunteers to confirm accuracy, operational feasibility, and political neutrality.

    Field case study

    In a besieged residential district, an ERR communications volunteer was tasked with drafting a quarterly donor update summarizing community kitchen operations and urgent medical needs. Facing a 30-minute internet connectivity window at a central community point, the volunteer copied the raw handover notes from the local logistics chat straight into a commercial AI chatbot.

    The raw text contained the full names of three volunteers managing the local kitchen, the specific neighborhood street where grain was stored, and the exact monetary amount spent purchasing supplies from a local merchant. The volunteer requested the AI tool to: "Write a detailed narrative report for international partners based on these notes."

    While the AI generated a polished, professional English report, it introduced severe risks and errors. First, it included the real names of the volunteers and the precise storage location in the text output, which was stored on cloud servers. Second, the AI miscalculated the meal totals by adding two unrelated supply figures, overstating output by 3,000 meals. Third, it used partisan terminology to describe the local security environment, phrasing that violated the room's strict commitment to political neutrality.

    A senior documentation volunteer reviewed the draft before submission, immediately identified the compromised security details and invented figures, and halted the report's release. The room held a review session to establish safe reporting procedures.

    Discussion Questions

    1. What specific pieces of sensitive information were exposed by pasting raw notes into the online AI tool?
    2. What operational and protection risks could have resulted if the report had been circulated externally without human review?
    3. How should the volunteer have prepared the raw field notes offline before submitting them to the AI model?

    Composite case, built from documented practice. Names and locations are illustrative.

    Practice drill

    Drill: Data Sanitization and Output Verification (30 Minutes)

    Objective

    Practice identifying security leaks in draft inputs, writing safe prompts, and verifying AI outputs for accuracy and neutrality.

    Materials Needed

    • Paper, pens, or offline text editors on phones/laptops.
    • Printed or written copies of the "Unsafe Field Handover Note" (provided below).

    Unsafe Field Handover Note (Sample Text)

    "Date: May 12. Khartoum South, Al-Kalakla district, Block 2 near the big pharmacy. Volunteer Ahmed Hassan and Dr. Sara Omer delivered 15 cartons of medicine to the emergency point. Purchased from Merchant Ibrahim for 4,500,000 SDG using Cash App account 0912345678. Shelling occurred near the military post at 4:00 PM. We served 450 meals today at the main kitchen."


    Step-by-Step Exercise Procedure

    1. Individual Sanitization (10 Minutes)

      • Read the sample handover note.
      • Rewrite the note into a safe format, replacing all names, specific locations, financial details, and security incidents with anonymized placeholders.
    2. Prompt Crafting (5 Minutes)

      • Write a clear, safe prompt asking an AI tool to turn your sanitized text into a clean 3-bullet summary report.
      • Example Safe Prompt: "Rephrase the following sanitized operational notes into a professional 3-bullet activity update for a weekly log: [Paste Sanitized Text]"
    3. Peer Review and Verification (10 Minutes)

      • Pair up with another volunteer.
      • Exchange your sanitized text and draft prompt.
      • Verify that your partner's text contains zero names, zero precise locations, zero financial identifiers, and zero sensitive security details.
    4. Plenary Reflection (5 Minutes)

      • Discuss as a group: What was the hardest piece of data to sanitize? How can your room ensure that no volunteer pastes un-sanitized notes into connected devices during rapid handovers?

    Success Criteria

    • Zero personal names, exact coordinates, bank details, or combatant actions remain in the sanitized text.
    • The resulting prompt provides clean instructions without compromising field security.
    • Volunteers demonstrate a clear checklist for reviewing AI-generated drafts prior to external use.

    References & further reading

    1. Open Knowledge / DataKind guidance on responsible data in humanitarian work; OCHA Centre for Humanitarian DataOCHA Centre for Humanitarian Data

      Provides essential standards for data responsibility and privacy protections when handling operational data in humanitarian crises.

    2. Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability (CHS Alliance, 2024)CHS Alliance

      Establishes benchmarks for data transparency, community accountability, and responsible information handling in frontline response.

    3. Do No Harm: A Framework for Analyzing the Impact of Assistance on Conflict (CDA Collaborative Learning)CDA Collaborative Learning

      Offers operational concepts to prevent aid activities and information management choices from aggravating local conflict or exposing communities to risk.

    4. ICRC: Professional Standards for Protection WorkICRC

      Outlines critical standards for managing sensitive individual and community data safely in active armed conflict settings.